MM Vitaoils Sdn Bhd - 2010 |
||||||||
Report ID | 3697 | Popularity | 2314 views 56 downloads | |||||
Report Date | Sep 2010 | Product | ||||||
Company / Issuer | MM Vitaoils Sdn Bhd | Sector | Consumer Products - Food Products | |||||
Price (RM) |
|
|||||||
Rationale |
MARC has affirmed its MARC-2ID rating on MM Vitaoils Sdn Bhd’s (MMV) RM45.0 million Murabahah Commercial Paper (MCP) Programme and maintained a negative outlook on the rating. The negative outlook reflects continued concerns over insufficient operating cash flows to support the build-up of MMV’s sinking fund from August 2011 onwards to meet its first CP redemption of RM20.25 million due in February 2012. Moderating MARC’s concerns somewhat is the satisfactory progress made by MMV in negotiations with its bankers to wholly refinance the outstanding commercial papers. MARC’s current rating action assumes successful refinancing of the rated facility by MMV’s targeted financial close of December 2010. Failure to complete the refinancing exercise by the indicated timeframe would exert downward pressure on the rating. The affirmed rating acknowledges MMV’s ability to respond to shifts in market demand, the non-cyclical nature of demand for its edible oil palm products and management’s cost rationalisation initiatives and efforts to improve operating efficiency. The rating, however, continues to be constrained by the price volatility of its raw materials which account for close to 80% of sales, its low production capacity utilisation rate, long cash conversion cycle and modest equity base. Gearing increased to 2.21 times (x) (FY2008: 1.71x) as the company drew down new trade facilities from a bank to support its working capital and capital expenditure requirements. Based on the latest management accounts for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, gearing has declined to 2.03x and remains within its covenanted 2.50x threshold. Unencumbered cash and bank balances stood at RM3.7 million as at June 30, 2010 relative to short-term borrowings of RM22.5 million. Major Rating FactorsStrengths
Challenges/Risks
|
|||||||
Related |