Olympia Industries Bhd - 2010 |
||||||||
Report ID | 3867 | Popularity | 1741 views 26 downloads | |||||
Report Date | Jan 2011 | Product | ||||||
Company / Issuer | Olympia Industries Bhd | Sector | Trading/Services - Others | |||||
Price (RM) |
|
|||||||
Rationale |
MARC has affirmed the rating of Olympia Industries Berhad’s (Olympia) outstanding RM72,981,306 nominal value Redeemable Unsecured Loan Stocks (RULS) at BB-. The outlook on the rating is maintained at negative. The rating action incorporates continued concern on the group’s weak profitability measures and earnings sustainability for its property and gaming divisions. MARC notes the slow progress made in its property project while the gaming segment will be negatively impacted by the 2% increase in pool betting duty effective from June 2010. Olympia is mainly involved in gaming in Sabah, property development and investment and stock broking services. Its gaming division, which has been a steady source of income to the group, is expected to register lower profitability going forward due to the upward revision in the pool betting duty to 8% from June 2010 onwards, although this has been partly mitigated by lower prize payouts in certain categories of the 4D game effective from December 2010. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 (1QFY2011), the gaming division reported an operating profit of RM0.3 million compared to RM1.7 million in the corresponding period last year. The lower earnings from the gaming division is not likely to be offset by any meaningful recovery in the performance of Olympia’s other divisions. Nevertheless, Olympia’s liquidity position as reflected by its cash and cash equivalents of RM34.0 million as of September 30, 2010 is inadequate to meet its short-term debt of RM49.6 million which includes the redemption of RM12.9 million under the RULS in April 2011. MARC remains concerned on Olympia’s weak income generation ability and the dependence on asset disposal to augment its liquidity position. Should its financial profile continue to deteriorate, the ratings could be lowered. Strengths
Challenges/Risks
|
|||||||
Related |