Ranhill Powertron II Sdn Bhd - 2015 |
||||||||
Report ID | 5060 | Popularity | 2249 views 15 downloads | |||||
Report Date | Jul 2015 | Product | ||||||
Company / Issuer | Ranhill Sabah Energy II Sdn Bhd | Sector | Infrastructure & Utilities - Power | |||||
Price (RM) |
|
|||||||
Rationale |
MARC has affirmed its ratings of AAAIS(fg) on Ranhill Powertron II Sdn Bhd’s (RPII) RM350 million
guaranteed notes and AAIS on RM360 million non-guaranteed notes. The
outlook for both ratings is stable. Both guaranteed and
non-guaranteed notes were issued under the RM710 million Islamic Medium-Term
Notes (IMTN) Programme. RPII was established to build, own and operate a
190-megawatt (MW) combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant, the Rugading Power
Station in Sabah, under a 21-year power purchase agreement (PPA). The special
purpose company is an 80%-owned subsidiary of Ranhill Group Sdn Bhd. The rating
on the guaranteed notes reflect the credit strength of an unconditional and
irrevocable Kafalah guarantee provided by financial guarantee insurer Danajamin
Nasional Berhad (Danajamin) on which MARC has a financial strength rating of
AAA/Stable. The rating on the non-guaranteed notes considers
RPII’s adequate projected debt service coverages and high predictability of
operating cash flows through the PPA. The PPA transfers demand risk and fuel
price risk to the offtaker Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd (SESB), an 83%-owned
subsidiary of Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB). MARC maintains a senior unsecured
debt rating of AAA/Stable on TNB. The rating on the non-guaranteed notes also
incorporates RPII’s sound plant performance and financial metrics that are
largely consistent with projections as well as SESB’s strong payment track record.
The rating is, however, constrained by RPII’s increased gearing and weakened
liquidity buffer following sizeable dividend payments. The Rugading Power Station, which accounts for about
11% of Sabah’s installed generation capacity, has continued to meet the
performance requirements under the PPA since the 79-day unscheduled outage at
end-2012, registering an average availability target of 96.1% and 100% in 2014
and 1Q2015 respectively. RPII’s unplanned outage rate (UOR), calculated on a
12-month rolling average basis, has normalised below the 4% limit since
February 2014. RPII has also achieved full pass-through of the natural gas and
distillate costs as a result of meeting the heat rate requirements. RPII’s 2014 capacity payments of RM96.4 million were
within expectations. However, its energy payments of RM117.9 million were
higher than the budgeted amount of RM104.6 million due to distillate firing in
March and August 2014. In line with higher PPA payments, the company’s 2014
revenue improved by 16.5% to RM127.1 million (2013: RM75.8 million). RPII’s
cash flow from operations (CFO) after taking into account the RM90 million
redemption of the redeemable convertible non-cumulative preference shares
(RCNPS) stood at RM102.0 million and was sufficient to cover the profit payment
and principal redemption totaling RM56.7 million in 2014. The finance service
cover ratio (FSCR) stood at 3.59 times, comfortably above the covenanted
minimum FSCR of 1.25 times in 2014. RPII’s shareholders’ funds decreased sharply to
RM169.5 million in 2014 (2013: RM330.1 million) following the dividend payout
of RM77.4 million and the redemption of RCNPS. While this has weakened the
company’s leverage covenant cushion, RPII’s leverage ratio of 78:22 is expected
to improve progressively as retained earnings are accumulated and outstanding
rated notes are pared down. In addition, RPII is prohibited from incurring
further indebtedness. MARC also expects RPII to take a prudent approach in
meeting shareholders’ dividend expectations even though the dividend
distribution is mitigated by restrictive
covenants. The stable outlook on the non-guaranteed notes
incorporates MARC’s expectations of a sustained stable plant performance and
RPII maintaining its credit profile commensurate with the current rating band.
Any weakening of RPII’s cash flow coverage and/or leverage metrics will
exert downward rating pressure on
the non-guaranteed notes. In respect of the guaranteed notes, any change in the rating and/or outlook will be
primarily driven by a change in Danajamin’s credit strength. Major Rating
Factors Strengths
Challenges/Risks
|
|||||||
Related |